Tags
- BFF (e.g. csDAOs): issue eco credits and attract resources
- Environmentalists: (eco-activists) associate $REGEN with public eco network/ledger and ecological health overall
- Impact Investors: hold $REGEN as a part of their portfolio
- DApp Developers / Token Engineers: launch complementary applications on the $REGEN ledger
- Network Steward(s): All types of the network stakeholders engage effectively in the $REGEN tokenomics development
- By Months
- April
- May
- June
Broken down by stakeholder and objective Based on the goals from Executive Summary (2024)
BFF (e.g. csDAOs): issue eco credits and attract resources
metric: # of methodologies/ $ funds acquired
- Total on-chain sales in Q2 ~$8.5k in the quarter (potential profit 5-20%)
- Mark DeRugeriis: $300k pipeline for the sales (Jaguar, Terrasos, Ecotoken, F1), $1M sales planned for the H2
- Methodologies in development
- Smallholder conservation agriculture by SmartAgro
- Regenerative cotton smallholder by Grameena Vikas Kendram Society
- Biodiversity Credits Protocol by Terrasos
- Forestry REDD+ by MOSS.earth
- Upgrade to Biodiversity Stewardship Credit Methodology by ERA Brazil
- Pollinator Habitat Funding
- Earthist network loan (~$50k) – ReFi Hub interested to facilitate (wait for the call)
Economy projections are getting there, still sales are the key bottleneck, loans might be more universal, especially in the bear market
Environmentalists: (eco-activists) associate $REGEN with public eco network/ledger and ecological health overall
Metric: $REGEN sentiment in eco events
- Overall outside of web3 bubble i don’t think many people know $REGEN
- Katapult fest insights: web3 plays (is seen playing?) a minor role in the climate tech
- Many ecologists know carbon offsets or ecosystem service payments, but it’s hard to argue that tokenisation brought some significant benefits already (especially in the Regen network)
- Curious how web3 and $regen could be discussed at the COPs
RegenCommons – maybe a shared effort to popularize ReFi/BFFs to the eco movements / experts
Impact Investors: hold $REGEN as a part of their portfolio
metric: # of web3 funds with #REGEN in mix, HODL timing
- No updates on significant purchases (again), rather sales pressure
- RND (and other dapps) could dedicate 10% of their budget to buying
- Constitution wg
Need to cut costs significantly, somebody should collect the needs / define & promote the opportunity (tokenomics?)
DApp Developers / Token Engineers: launch complementary applications on the $REGEN ledger
metric: # of apps
- Cosmwasm upgrade coming
- Consensus protocol changes
- Cross chain plans (ecotoken etc)
- Total size of liquidity pool $158k (excluding qREGEN) – almost no change from the last Q
Community fund and strategy
Network Steward(s): All types of the network stakeholders engage effectively in the $REGEN tokenomics development
Metric: feedback by stakeholder type (council mvp)
- Stewards
- Prioritise better, bcs time and people are limited
- Consesus work
- RegenBank – BFF (right at the pattern level, symbiotic to ecocredits)
- Constitution and council connection
- Subgroups with specific people, solidifying (focused conversations/subchats)
- Reengaging people who signed up before / updating the list
- Eco
- Move to Discord++/Hylo? (connect with telegram sync?)
- Investors
- Drive $regen usage in the ecocredit purchase
- Taking responsibility for the $regen promotion/coordination to impact investors?
- Devs
- Bridging $regen to multichain
By Months
April
- Processes update (roles, circles, coordination)
- RegenCoopBank – Bioregional Development with Cooperative Banking
- $REGEN Investor Data Room
- Customer Development
May
- Discussion on changing the consensus model and lowering validation costs for the network happen (a commonwealth post to appear soon)
- $REGEN constitution discussion and stewards council proposal + ppt
- Now researching the opportunities of a lending pool for local projects and $regen csDAOs
June
- Further Consensus discussions and evaluations
- Bank MVP
- RND Needs (see Mark DeRugeriis)